- “There was a wedding at Cana in Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there. Jesus and his disciples were also invited to the wedding.
When the wine ran short, the mother of Jesus said to him, “They have no wine.” And Jesus said to her, “Woman, how does your concern affect me? My hour has not yet come.” His mother said to the servers, “Do whatever he tells you.”
Now there were six stone water jars there for Jewish ceremonial washings, each holding twenty to thirty gallons. Jesus told them, “Fill the jars with water.” So they filled them to the brim. Then he told them, “Draw some out now and take it to the headwaiter.” So they took it. And when the headwaiter tasted the water that had become wine, without knowing where it came from — although the servers who had drawn the water knew —, the headwaiter called the bridegroom and said to him, “Everyone serves good wine first, and then when people have drunk freely, an inferior one; but you have kept the good wine until now.”
Jesus did this as the beginning of his signs at Cana in Galilee and so revealed his glory, and his disciples began to believe in him.”
Like all of the Gospel of John, this section is jam packed with theological implications and spiritual light. It’s always important to remember that John never wastes words, sentences, or periods. Absolutely every verse in John has some connection to the Old Testament, and to something else that he wrote about in the same book. It’s the best woven and poetic book in all of the New Testament. There’s not enough time to really extract everything that John is trying to communicate in his account of the Wedding at Cana, so I just want to touch on a few things that I’ve always found interesting.
The first thing we learn about this Wedding is that it took place on the “third day”. To understand what John means by the “third day” we have to revisit his earlier chapters to discover his theological chronology. In my book Cooperating with God: Life with the Cross, I wrote about the mystery of John’s theological chronology in depth and how he parallels it to the chronology of the priestly account in the first chapter of Genesis. By the time he gets to the Wedding Feast John has already written about four days of the new creation, so when we see that the Wedding Feast took place on the “third day”, what he is meaning to say is that this is the third day after the fourth day, which makes it day seven (the Sabbath), according to his theological chronology of the new creation. In Genesis we read that “God blessed the seventh day and made it holy” (Gen. 2:3). In this same way, Jesus blessed the Wedding at Cana and gave a prototype sign of future blessings when He had water (the Holy Spirit) poured into six pure (set apart) vessels, which represent man and woman who were created on the sixth day. Only after these pure vessels had been filled with water were they able to bring forth the fruit of the vine (wine/love/Blood of Christ).
One mistake that people who don’t do proper exegesis oftentimes fall into is misunderstand the role of Mary at the Wedding Feast. You’ll find this error quite often with Protestants who distance themselves from the life of our Blessed Mother. When Mary comes to her Son and says to Him, “They have no wine,” and He responds to her by saying, “Woman, how does your concern affect me? My hour has not yet come,” the word “Woman” here is not an insult or something pejorative. On the contrary, what John is conveying here is that Jesus had just paid His mother the highest compliment. Again, we have to understand Genesis if we are going to understand John.
The first time the word ‘woman’ is used in the Bible was at the creation of ‘woman’. In Hebrew, the word that Jesus would have used is ‘isha’ (alef shin hey – אישה) (pronounced ee-SHAH). Similarly, man or adam in Hebrew is simply ‘ish’. Therefore, the first compliment Jesus gives His mother is by calling her ‘isha’. In this way He is raising her up to her true dignity of being the new Eve. He also compliments her in a second way when He calls her ‘isha’, by acknowledging that she is part of, and comes from, and is for ‘ish’. In other words, Jesus is acknowledging here that His mother Mary is truly wo-man – truly isha in that she is precisely to man – to ish what she was created to be for him.
Then when He asked, “how does your concern affect me?” John means to demonstrate here how the new Eve is different than the first Eve. That is, while the first Eve pressed upon her husband a concern of hers that lead to the fall of humanity, the New Eve presses upon her Son a concern of His that lead to the restoration of humanity. Then the new Eve tells her Son what this concern has to do with Him when she tells the servers, “Do whatever he tells you.” Again, this is quite a contrast from the first woman who vacated her position of being precisely what she was created to be for ish. While the first Eve told the ish who she had been created for to do what he should not have done, the new Eve trusts the ish who she had been created for to do what He was called to do, by telling the servers to “Do whatever He tells you.”
“Now there were six stone water jars there for Jewish ceremonial washings, each holding twenty to thirty gallons. Jesus told the them, “Fill the jars with water.” This final point about the vessels that Jesus had filled with water is one I wrote about in my book Cooperating with God: The Bridegroom’s Prayer:
At this wedding there were six stone water jars (vessels) that had been cleaned and prepared for the ceremonial washing. Because these jars had never been used before, we can call them ‘virgin jars’. That there were six of them is no coincidence, as man was created on the sixth day. Something unfortunate and unexpected had occurred at this wedding feast that caused it to run out of wine. Allegorically, the wedding became just like Cain – not able to bear fruit. What happened next was something very, very intimate. After being prompted by His Mother, the Lord told the servers to fill the jars with water. Of course Jesus was fully capable of doing this type of labor Himself, but it was proper for the community to Cooperate with God. That was the least that they could do for the free gift of new wine. The virgin jars were filled to the brim with water; that is, the vessel and water, which had previously been separate and foreign to one another, had now become one, and out of this intimate and divine union came Heavenly fruit. The meaning of the imagery here is that whenever man is filled with the Holy Spirit he will produce fruit. St. Augustine of Hippo, in his sermon on 1 John, explained it in this way:
- “Such is our Christian life. By desiring Heaven we exercise the powers of our soul. Now this exercise will be effective only to the extent that we free ourselves from desires leading to infatuation with this world. Let me return to the example I have already used, of filling an empty container. God means to fill each of you with what is good; so cast out what is bad! If he wishes to fill you with honey and you are full of sour wine, where is the honey to go? The vessel must be emptied of its contents and then be cleaned. Yes, it must be cleansed even if you have to work hard and scour it. It must be made fit for the new thing, whatever it may be.”
- Click Here Read More From the: Fresh Catholic Perspective Series
Scripture texts in this blog are taken from the New American Bible with Revised New Testament and Revised Psalms © 1991, 1986, 1970 Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C. and are used by permission of the copyright owner. All Rights Reserved. No part of the New American Bible may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the copyright owner.